The forest

What grows on Takasu Snow Park

Mostly deciduous — broadleaf woods and larch. They stand bare through the winter, and you can see a long way into them.

Read off the national vegetation survey. Where the pistes are cut the survey records open ground, so the ski area draws itself.

Plan view of the forest around Takasu Snow Park. Bare deciduous woods pale, evergreen conifer dark, open ground lightest.
Plan view, about 6.6 km across, faintly shaded by the mountain's own relief. The pale threads are the pistes — the survey records them as open ground.
Darker ink is denser forest — evergreen conifer that stays closed through the winter. Paler is deciduous, bare from November, and you can see a long way into it; palest is not forest at all. The same inks carry every bar below.
Forest cover
88%
of the ground this map covers
Bare in winter
81%
of that forest — it drops its leaves
Planted stands
21%
of the ground the survey classified — set in rows, all one age
Natural forest
26%
of the ground the survey classified — level 9 on its ten-point scale
Most open at
1,487–1,597m
the height you can see furthest into the trees at
Commonest stand
オオバクロモジ-ミズナラ群集
38% of the ground the survey classified
Plant communities
22
distinct types on this mountain alone
Surveyed
2007
fieldwork years, not the 2024 edition

Where that sits among the mountains we publish

least bare 35%94% most bare

Its forest goes bare more readily than 11 of the 29 mountains we publish.

01

Sight range, level by level

The mountain seen side-on. How far you can see into the trees changes with height, and each band is drawn level with its own row.

Height What you can see through Bare
1,597–1,707 m
100%
1,487–1,597 m
100%
1,377–1,487 m
100%
1,267–1,377 m
96%
1,157–1,267 m
91%
1,047–1,157 m
80%
937–1,047 m
81%
827–937 m
65%
717–827 m
47%
607–717 m
57%
closed 50% 100%
Section through the mountain. Each band is the row beside it.

Each reading is a share of that band's own forest, not of the mountain, and a band holding too little forest to state one is left blank. The pale bar behind the section is how much ground sits at that height, so a swing over a sliver of mountain does not read as a headline. No treeline is drawn — the survey describes stands, not a line.

02

What stands beside each run

A band 35 to 90 m either side of each run’s centre line: outside the groomed piste, inside what you look at from it. Ordered by how much of that band is forest you can see through in winter.

Run The band either side See-through
Champion Course 1,121 m 85%
Challenge Course 328 m 81%
Gold Course 443 m 80%
Diamond Course 1,123 m 78%
Panorama Course 1,579 m 77%
Exciting B Course 1,236 m 75%
Technical Course 261 m 68%
Jinchu A Course 1,015 m 67%
The other 23 runs
Run The band either side See-through
Exciting A Course 818 m 66%
Super Course 282 m 64%
Beta-Alpha Connector 726 m 63%
Challenge B Course 262 m 62%
Bamboo Course 3,013 m 61%
Challenge Tree Run 272 m 60%
Challenge C Course 343 m 60%
Dynamic Course 2,598 m 57%
Rapid Course 626 m 56%
Paradise A Course 1,954 m 56%
Kumadana Course 461 m 55%
Paradise B Course 435 m 53%
Skyline B Course 1,248 m 51%
Jinchu B Course 294 m 48%
Otome Course 278 m 47%
Expert Course 269 m 47%
Skyline A Course 1,250 m 44%
Otome Tree Run 251 m 41%
Beginners Course 1,454 m 38%
Downhill Course 1,536 m 36%
Jinchu Slalom Bahn 327 m 27%
Daiichi Slope 490 m 26%
Karamatsu Slope 410 m 21%

Each figure is a share of the surveyed ground in a band 35–90 m either side of that run — not of the run, and not of the mountain. The survey resolves about 16 m on the ground and the band is a few cells wide, so this says what the band is made of, never what one tree, one gap or one line of sight is like. A run the survey barely covers is left out rather than stated from a handful of cells. No treeline and no stem density: the survey records stands, not either of those.

03

What actually grows here

The survey sorts every polygon into one of its own vegetation zones before it gives a stand a name. Five or six zones describe a mountain; the named stands underneath them run to dozens.

Vegetation zone Share of classified ground Share
Beech-zone regrowth ブナクラス域代償植生 45%
Natural beech-zone forest ブナクラス域自然植生 27%
Plantation and farmland 植林地・耕作地植生 25%
Natural subalpine conifer forest コケモモ-トウヒクラス域自然植生 2%
Other その他 1%
Evergreen broadleaf-zone regrowth ヤブツバキクラス域代償植生 1%
Alpine natural vegetation 高山帯自然植生域 0%

The named stands underneath

The survey’s own community names, largest first. They are proper names for stand types and the survey publishes no English for them, so they stand in Japanese here rather than as a translation we invented.

  • オオバクロモジ-ミズナラ群集 38%
  • チシマザサ-ブナ群団 26%
  • スギ・ヒノキ・サワラ植林 16%
  • カラマツ植林 4%
  • ススキ群団(V) 3%
  • コナラ群落(V) 2%
The other 16 communities
  • チシマザサ群落(II) 2%
  • 畑雑草群落 2%
  • 水田雑草群落 1%
  • 緑の多い住宅地 1%
  • ササ群落(V) 1%
  • ユキグニミツバツツジ-アカマツ群集 1%
  • チシマザサ群落(IV) 1%
  • 路傍・空地雑草群落 0%
  • 放棄畑雑草群落 0%
  • 雪田草原 0%
  • なだれ地自然低木群落 0%
  • 伐採跡地群落(V) 0%
  • 牧草地 0%
  • 市街地 0%
  • 開放水域 0%
  • ヒノキ群落 0%

Every share is of the ground the survey classified on this mountain — not of the forest, and not of the ski area. The zones are the survey’s own; the English beside each one is our gloss and the Japanese is what the source says. Ordering is by area, and says nothing about what skis well.

04

How natural this vegetation is

The survey places every polygon on a ten-point scale of how little people changed it: 1 is made ground with almost nothing growing on it, 10 is natural grassland and alpine heath. It measures interference and nothing else — natural fir sits at 9 and is a wall you cannot see through, a larch plantation sits at 6 and is evenly spaced and lovely to ski.

Level Share of classified ground Share
10 Natural grassland and alpine heath 2%
9 Natural forest 26%
7 Secondary forest 41%
6 Plantation 21%
5 Tall secondary grassland 4%
4 Short secondary grassland 1%
2 Farmland and green residential land 5%
1 Built-up and made ground 0%

A fraction of a percent of the classified ground carries a code that is not one of the ten levels. It is left out of the rows above rather than counted as a level.

Every share is of the ground the survey classified on this mountain. The scale records how little people interfered and nothing else: it is not a ranking, and a higher level is not a better place to ski. Levels this mountain does not carry are absent rather than drawn as zero.

National vegetation survey, 2024 edition — Biodiversity Center, Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Modified data, not produced by the Ministry.

This mountain's polygons were surveyed in 2007: the edition is 2024, the looking is older.

About 16 m per cell — fine enough to describe a hillside, never an individual gap between two trees.